On 3/7/22 12:40, Pali Rohár wrote:
Hello!
On Sunday 06 March 2022 14:38:57 Tony Dinh wrote:
Hi Pali,
I have an observation, which is not related to this patch. But about the kwboot options changes in general, I hope it is OK to mention it here.
Before the changes you've made to solve the problem with the -b option, I can do this:
kwboot -t -B 115200 /dev/ttyUSB0 -b uboot.kwb
Interesting... I did not know that this kind of setup worked. It was not documented neither in usage nor in manpage. Normally in applications and scripts, all option arguments are before non-option (positional) argument.
But now, the -b option can not be used after the tty device name. All options must appear before the tty device.
Is this the actual intention? it did break some of my existing aliases/scripts (It is not a big deal to retrofit them). Just want to make sure I understand the reason to make the tty device a positional argument for kwboot.
Thanks, Tony
Marek, Stefan, do you want to support above (old) handling of positional tty device argument to be present in the middle of option arguments?
I personally don't...
I think I can develop some "hack" patch for argv[] processing to support this operation. But my question is, if this is something which we want to officially support. Because if not, it is better to have separate option arguments and positional arguments like in any other application.
...
The only case I can think of, is scripts that use the "incorrect" format and might fail now. I don't have any such scripts and I would not object to breaking this backward compatibility. Tony, what's your thinking on this? Marek?
Thanks, Stefan