On Wednesday, August 10, 2011 03:45:11 AM Hong Xu wrote:
Hi Marek Vasut,
On 08/10/2011 03:55 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 03:57:41 AM Hong Xu wrote:
Hi Marek Vasut,
On 08/09/2011 01:34 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
[...]
printf("WARNING: %s - start address %x is not aligned\n" __FUNCTION__, start);__func__ is prefered in linux kernel :-)
__func__ is C99 standard. __FUNCTION__ appears more in U-Boot. ;-)
This doesn't mean it's correct ;-) "majority proof" isn't a proof really.
GCC manual says some older GCC only recognize __FUNCTION__ . If we rely on GCC, it looks __FUNCTION__ will reduce troubles.
Do we support such ancient versions of GCC anyway ? Just to be clear, I'm fine with either way, just my 2.7183 cents ;-)
Agree. Just after last reply, I reconsidered the situation in the tearoom. __func__ looks better. ;-) I'll resend the patch soon, thanks.
Thanks, I'm very much looking forward to this patch in mainline.
BR, Eric