On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear ksi@koi8.net,
In message Pine.LNX.4.64ksi.0812161102580.28667@home-gw.koi8.net you wrote:
I offered 4 possible scenarios and additional parameter to i2c
functions was
one of them. Wolfgang said that current bus approach looks better than others and I agree with him. But it is not rocket science to use an
You and me agree on this.
additional parameter either. The only thing is it MUST be consistent,
i.e.
we should NOT have 2 different sets of functions based on
CONFIG_MULTIBUS or
We agree on this, too.
whatever. If we are to make this change ALL boards must be multibus
with
majority of them having bus count of 1.
I don't think this makes sense - it would just add complexity and memory footprint without added benefit.
Does anybody else have something to say on this? I'm going to write
code so
let's make some decision. I don't want this to end up as a company
hack and
making it properly affects a lot of U-boot...
I support your position, not Timur's.
OK, so I'm on it. It might take a couple of weeks for patches to show up.
--- ****************************************************************** * KSI@home KOI8 Net < > The impossible we do immediately. * * Las Vegas NV, USA < > Miracles require 24-hour notice. * ******************************************************************