On 20:02-20130313, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 13 mrt. 2013, om 16:07 heeft Nishanth Menon nm@ti.com het volgende geschreven:
On 16:05-20130313, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 13 mrt. 2013, om 16:02 heeft Nishanth Menon nm@ti.com het volgende geschreven:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Koen Kooi koen@dominion.thruhere.net wrote:
Op 13 mrt. 2013, om 15:35 heeft Nishanth Menon nm@ti.com het volgende geschreven:
On 10:20-20130313, Tom Rini wrote: > From: Koen Kooi koen@dominion.thruhere.net > > Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi koen@dominion.thruhere.net > Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard jacmet@sunsite.dk > --- > include/configs/am335x_evm.h | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/configs/am335x_evm.h b/include/configs/am335x_evm.h > index 33ee2c4..abf4e39 100644 > --- a/include/configs/am335x_evm.h > +++ b/include/configs/am335x_evm.h > @@ -87,6 +87,8 @@ > "findfdt="\ > "if test $board_name = A335BONE; then " \ > "setenv fdtfile am335x-bone.dtb; fi; " \ > + "if test $board_name = A335BNLT; then " \ > + "setenv fdtfile am335x-bonelt.dtb; fi; " \ could we not use am335x-boneblack.dtb instead?
it's bonelt in the kernel, so boneblack would fail to load a dtb
$ git describe v3.9-rc2 $ ls arch/arm/boot/dts/*bone*.dts* arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-bone.dts ???
What a surprise, missing stuff in mainline! It's present in the vendor kernel, which is what is shipping with the board.
No surprise there as marketing names are finalized close to product launches. If there is an vendor u-boot, it can remain in sync with what ever the vendor kernel is. If it is upstream, we might want to think longterm.
I'm in charge of pushing the am335x-bonelt.dts upstream to Linus and I'd like to keep everything in sync. I'm not fond of renaming it again, the EEPROM says BNLT, not BNB :)
:) I will leave it at EEPROM entry defining what the file name should be and if it is not same as product's official name, guess it is some one's future explanation burden ;)