On Mon, 16 May 2011 19:40:30 +0530 Aneesh V aneesh@ti.com wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
On Monday 16 May 2011 01:22 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
I think, in the first step of this series, we should move the existing code from nand_spl and onenand_ipl into something like spl/nand and spl/onenand, respectivly, and make sure all teh existing systems still build. The we can add more such support.
IMHO, we should just have spl/board/<vendor>/<board>/ .
Let spl/board/<vendor>/<board>/Makefile decide what it wants to build.
That's what we do in nand_spl/onenand_spl -- the common files are more like libraries that the board makefile may or may not pull in (e.g. many Freescale boards use nand_boot_fsl_elbc.c or nand_boot_fsl_nfc.c instead of nand_boot.c).
Renaming nand_spl seems like it should be the first step.
I mean something like this(similar changes for ONENAND):
+.PHONEY : SPL
.PHONY
-Scott