On 10/4/23 15:26, Paul Barker wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 02:15:24PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 10/4/23 09:59, Paul Barker wrote:
On 03/10/2023 13:46, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 9/20/23 14:42, Paul Barker wrote:
Add a config option for the R9A07G044L SoC used in the RZ/G2L so that we can make use of this in the subsequent driver patches.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker paul.barker.ct@bp.renesas.com Reviewed-by: Biju Das biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com
arch/arm/mach-rmobile/Kconfig.rzg2l | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rmobile/Kconfig.rzg2l b/arch/arm/mach-rmobile/Kconfig.rzg2l index 37ff6cd34160..266f82c18085 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-rmobile/Kconfig.rzg2l +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rmobile/Kconfig.rzg2l @@ -3,6 +3,11 @@ if RZG2L +config R9A07G044L
- bool "Renesas R9A07G044L SoC"
- help
Enable support for the R9A07G044L SoC used in the RZ/G2L.I was under the impression that RZ/G2L is a SoC family, so the R9A07G044L is part of that SoC family ? Maybe just reword this paragraph and the commit message a bit to make it less confusing.
The confusion is hard to avoid (see my reply re patch 5 of this series), but I'll see if I can improve this a bit in v2.
So uh ... RZ/G2L is both the name of R9A07G044L SoC (what's the R9... model number of e.g. RZ/G2LC?) and a family name ?
Yes. Definitely easy to confuse!
We have (with differences from the RZ/G2L model numbers highlighted):
- RZ/G2L (R9A07G044L1 or R9A07G044L2)
- RZ/G2LC (R9A07G044*C*1 or R9A07G044*C*2)
- RZ/G2UL (R9A07G04*3U1*)
- RZ/V2L (R9A07G0*5*4L1 or R9A07G0*5*4L2)
- RZ/Five (R9A07G04*3F0*)
The last digit indicates the number of cores (1 or 2), except for on the RZ/Five which has one core but the model number ends in a zero.
OK, got it, thanks !