29 Feb
2012
29 Feb
'12
8:06 p.m.
On Wednesday 29 February 2012 04:02:39 jean-philippe francois wrote:
Le 29 février 2012 00:40, Scott Wood scottwood@freescale.com a écrit :
Is this a 16-bit NAND? If so, the first two bytes have to be 0xffff, unless the controller driver defines the bad block pattern differently.
It is an 8 bit nand. The badblock patern can be redefined by the controller driver to be different from the one in nand_base.c ? Do you have an example of this ?
look at the Blackfin nand driver (in u-boot and linux). we have to override the badblock layout because our on-chip boot rom expects something other than what linux uses. -mike