Frederik Kriewitz wrote:
Jean-Christophe asked me to move it out of the omap3 "vendor" directory:
On 10:55 Thu 20 Aug , Frederik Kriewitz wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARDplagnioj@jcrosoft.com wrote:
board/omap3/devkit8000/Makefile | 52 +++++ board/omap3/devkit8000/config.mk | 35 ++++ board/omap3/devkit8000/devkit8000.c | 124 ++++++++++++ board/omap3/devkit8000/devkit8000.h | 373 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
no need board are allow in board/omap3 please create your own vendor dirent or just put it in board/
What do you mean with that?
board/devkit8000/devkit8000.h or board/embedinfo/devkit8000/devkit8000.h
I'm confused, where am I supposed to use omap3 and where not?
Yes, sometimes it can be confusing ;)
From earlier discussions I understood that Jean-Christophe doesn't like
board/omap3/
I'm not totally sure what he actually wants, but I think something like
board/ti/omap3 board/ti/omap2 board/ti/omap1 board/ti/davinci
etc. (e.g. like board/atmel).
While I don't care what we use, like with other discussions we should do it consistent. That is, having already x boards in omap3 and now adding the next board somewhere else isn't ok. As long as we don't have the new directory layout, new boards should use the old one. If we want an other directory layout, we should *first* move all existing boards to the other directory (ideally doing this directly in git). *Then* new patches can and have to use this new layout.
Conclusion: Until we don't have an other directory layout, I'm fine with board/omap3/devkit8000
Best regards
Dirk