
Hi Keerthy,
On 1 June 2017 at 23:19, Keerthy j-keerthy@ti.com wrote:
The driver provides regulator set/get voltage enable/disable functions for lp87565 family of PMICs.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy j-keerthy@ti.com
drivers/power/regulator/Kconfig | 8 ++ drivers/power/regulator/Makefile | 1 + drivers/power/regulator/lp87565_regulator.c | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 208 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/power/regulator/lp87565_regulator.c
diff --git a/drivers/power/regulator/Kconfig b/drivers/power/regulator/Kconfig index ef057e0..203292f 100644 --- a/drivers/power/regulator/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/power/regulator/Kconfig @@ -149,3 +149,11 @@ config DM_REGULATOR_LP873X This enables implementation of driver-model regulator uclass features for REGULATOR LP873X and the family of LP873X PMICs. The driver implements get/set api for: value and enable.
+config DM_REGULATOR_LP87565
bool "Enable driver for LP87565 PMIC regulators"
depends on PMIC_LP87565
---help---
This enables implementation of driver-model regulator uclass
features for REGULATOR LP87565 and the family of LP87565 PMICs.
The driver implements get/set api for value and enable.
What regulators are available? LDOs / bucks ?
diff --git a/drivers/power/regulator/Makefile b/drivers/power/regulator/Makefile index 3e01021..ce14d08 100644 --- a/drivers/power/regulator/Makefile +++ b/drivers/power/regulator/Makefile @@ -18,3 +18,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DM_REGULATOR_SANDBOX) += sandbox.o obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_TPS65090) += tps65090_regulator.o obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_)DM_REGULATOR_PALMAS) += palmas_regulator.o obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_)DM_REGULATOR_LP873X) += lp873x_regulator.o +obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_)DM_REGULATOR_LP87565) += lp87565_regulator.o diff --git a/drivers/power/regulator/lp87565_regulator.c b/drivers/power/regulator/lp87565_regulator.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f6a552e --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/power/regulator/lp87565_regulator.c @@ -0,0 +1,199 @@ +/*
- (C) Copyright 2016
- Texas Instruments Incorporated, <www.ti.com>
- Keerthy j-keerthy@ti.com
- SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
- */
+#include <common.h> +#include <fdtdec.h> +#include <errno.h> +#include <dm.h> +#include <i2c.h> +#include <power/pmic.h> +#include <power/regulator.h> +#include <power/lp87565.h>
+DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
+static const char lp87565_buck_ctrl1[LP87565_BUCK_NUM] = {0x2, 0x4, 0x6, 0x8, 0x2, 0x6}; +static const char lp87565_buck_vout[LP87565_BUCK_NUM] = {0xA, 0xC, 0xE, 0x10, 0xA, 0xE };
+static int lp87565_buck_enable(struct udevice *dev, int op, bool *enable) +{
int ret;
unsigned int adr;
struct dm_regulator_uclass_platdata *uc_pdata;
uc_pdata = dev_get_uclass_platdata(dev);
adr = uc_pdata->ctrl_reg;
ret = pmic_reg_read(dev->parent, adr);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
if (op == PMIC_OP_GET) {
ret &= LP87565_BUCK_MODE_MASK;
if (ret)
*enable = true;
else
*enable = false;
return 0;
} else if (op == PMIC_OP_SET) {
if (*enable)
ret |= LP87565_BUCK_MODE_MASK;
else
ret &= ~(LP87565_BUCK_MODE_MASK);
Drop ()
ret = pmic_reg_write(dev->parent, adr, ret);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
return 0;
+}
+static int lp87565_buck_volt2hex(int uV)
I'm a bit unsure about the word 'hex' here. Would it be better to use 'val'?
+{
if (uV > LP87565_BUCK_VOLT_MAX)
return -EINVAL;
else if (uV > 1400000)
return (uV - 1420000) / 20000 + 0x9E;
else if (uV > 730000)
return (uV - 735000) / 5000 + 0x18;
else if (uV >= 500000)
return (uV - 500000) / 10000;
else
return -EINVAL;
+}
+static int lp87565_buck_hex2volt(int hex) +{
if (hex > LP87565_BUCK_VOLT_MAX_HEX)
return -EINVAL;
else if (hex > 0x9D)
return 1400000 + (hex - 0x9D) * 20000;
else if (hex > 0x17)
return 730000 + (hex - 0x17) * 5000;
else if (hex >= 0x0)
return 500000 + hex * 10000;
else
return -EINVAL;
+}
+static int lp87565_buck_val(struct udevice *dev, int op, int *uV) +{
unsigned int hex, adr;
int ret;
struct dm_regulator_uclass_platdata *uc_pdata;
uc_pdata = dev_get_uclass_platdata(dev);
if (op == PMIC_OP_GET)
*uV = 0;
adr = uc_pdata->volt_reg;
ret = pmic_reg_read(dev->parent, adr);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
if (op == PMIC_OP_GET) {
ret &= LP87565_BUCK_VOLT_MASK;
ret = lp87565_buck_hex2volt(ret);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
*uV = ret;
return 0;
}
hex = lp87565_buck_volt2hex(*uV);
if (hex < 0)
return hex;
ret &= 0x0;
ret |= hex;
Can you just use ret = hex ?
ret = pmic_reg_write(dev->parent, adr, ret);
return ret;
+}
+static int lp87565_buck_probe(struct udevice *dev) +{
struct dm_regulator_uclass_platdata *uc_pdata;
int idx;
uc_pdata = dev_get_uclass_platdata(dev);
uc_pdata->type = REGULATOR_TYPE_BUCK;
idx = dev->driver_data;
if (idx == 0 || idx == 1 || idx == 2 || idx == 3) {
debug("Single phase regulator\n");
} else if (idx == 23) {
idx = 5;
} else if (idx == 10) {
idx = 4;
} else {
printf("Wrong ID for regulator\n");
return -1;
-EINVAL or something like that. -1 is -EPERM
}
uc_pdata->ctrl_reg = lp87565_buck_ctrl1[idx];
uc_pdata->volt_reg = lp87565_buck_vout[idx];
return 0;
+}
+static int buck_get_value(struct udevice *dev) +{
int uV;
int ret;
ret = lp87565_buck_val(dev, PMIC_OP_GET, &uV);
if (ret)
return ret;
return uV;
+}
+static int buck_set_value(struct udevice *dev, int uV) +{
return lp87565_buck_val(dev, PMIC_OP_SET, &uV);
+}
+static bool buck_get_enable(struct udevice *dev) +{
bool enable = false;
int ret;
ret = lp87565_buck_enable(dev, PMIC_OP_GET, &enable);
if (ret)
return ret;
return enable;
+}
+static int buck_set_enable(struct udevice *dev, bool enable) +{
return lp87565_buck_enable(dev, PMIC_OP_SET, &enable);
+}
+static const struct dm_regulator_ops lp87565_buck_ops = {
.get_value = buck_get_value,
.set_value = buck_set_value,
.get_enable = buck_get_enable,
.set_enable = buck_set_enable,
+};
+U_BOOT_DRIVER(lp87565_buck) = {
.name = LP87565_BUCK_DRIVER,
.id = UCLASS_REGULATOR,
.ops = &lp87565_buck_ops,
.probe = lp87565_buck_probe,
+};
1.9.1
Regards, Simon