30 May
2014
30 May
'14
9:16 p.m.
Hi Tom,
On 30 May 2014 12:59, Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:11:31PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
In a few cases the behaviour of both the hush and built-in parsers seems incorrect. One such case was exposed by commit 1992dbf which attempted to execute a simple command using hush and get the correct return value. Further digging exposed the other problems.
Can you please rebase this on master again? I imagine it doesn't quite apply again with the splitting out in main.c series that's applied now, thanks!
Yes, I'll take a look now.
Regards, Simon