On Feb 22, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Bartlomiej Sieka wrote:
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Kumar, in message <Pine.LNX. 4.64.0802181306060.21964@blarg.am.freescale.net> you wrote:
Changed image_get_ramdisk() to just return NULL on error and have get_ramdisk() propogate that error to the caller. It's left to the caller to call do_reset() if it wants to.
Also moved calling do_reset() in get_fdt() on ppc to a common location. In the future we will change get_fdt() to return success/failure and not call do_reset() at all.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala galak@kernel.crashing.org
Just to make my position clear: I expect that you negotiate new-image related patches more or less directly with Bartek, who I consider as kind of "new-image" custodian. That means that I will not track the state of these patches - if you want me to apply something directly, please ring a bell. Bartek: I would also appreciate if you could merge Kumar's patches in a local repo and then send me just a pull request when something is ready to go into u-boot-testing (or even into mainline).
OK, will coordinate new uImage stuff that gets posted to the list, and request pulling as needed.
Works for me. I'll look at updating my patches based on the new code in the branch.
- k