
22 Jun
2005
22 Jun
'05
11:09 a.m.
--- Yuli Barcohen yuli@arabellasw.com wrote:
Generally speaking, it depends on the chip select initialisations. If you set correct size (8MB in this case), TEXT_ADDR will not be mapped at all with such CFG_FLASH_BASE=0xFE000000.
Ummm, I don't agree. If set BR0[BA] as FE00, u-boot would know how to map TEXT_ADDR like FFF00000 at physical address FE700000 in this case 8MB.
But I do aggree raymond to try 0xFF800000 as CFG_FLASH_BASE you suggested or the one wolfgang mentioned:-)
Indeed, raymond should use LOW BOOT setting _rather than_ use HIGH BOOT to splite 8MB flash to two part for boot loader.
Thanks,
Sam
___________________________________________________________ 雅虎免费G邮箱-中国第一绝无垃圾邮件骚扰超大邮箱 http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/?id=77071