Hi Fabio,
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Fabio Estevam festevam@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:31:06AM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, yes! Sorry I wanted to say the original proposal to "return 0" instead. But now I failed to understand why this fixed the issue because those error numbers are not zero.
The problem only happens if we return a negative value.
And why returning zero is bad? From a working PCIe controller (either
It is not bad, but I still prefer to keep in sync with the kernel driver.
And would allow further features later on?
That's correct, Tom.
What new feature would benefit from this? These two PCIe drivers are non-DM drivers and DM PCI is not utilizing those error codes, instead DM PCI is using U-Boot standard error codes.
Regards, Bin