30 Jul
2013
30 Jul
'13
11:21 p.m.
On 07/30/2013 03:19 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org mailto:swarren@wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
...
I think when init_sequence_f[] is running, there may be no serial console to report errors. If so, moving the I2C initialization to that early point sounds like a really bad idea.Not really - when you see the U-Boot banner the console is working, and we clearly see the U-Boot banner before i2c init happens.
I thought it got buffered up and only actually sent to the UART much later, and not in the case when something failed since U-Boot wouldn't get that far? Or, did that proposal get shot down?