Re: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC] u-boot migration to kconfig

On 9/23/07, Shinya Kuribayashi skuribay@ruby.dti.ne.jp wrote:

Ulf Samuelsson wrote:

...

It would be more useful to collect all boards using one specific chip in a single directory. arch/arm/<chip>/board.

This is too tight, isn't it? Strictly speaking, boards are not related to chips (at least for me). So I'll vote +1 for Jean's.

Just to throw a wrench in the works, what about boards like the Xilinx ML403 which can be *either* PowerPC or MicroBlaze. :-)

I still think sticking with the existing board/ directory (but perhaps organizing it better) makes the most sense. Each board directory can pull in whatever cpu/soc support it needs.

Cheers, g.