-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 01/10/2013 02:26 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 01/10/2013 11:16 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 01/10/2013 04:43 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Igor Grinberg grinberg@compulab.co.il wrote:
On 12/27/12 15:36, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > This patch adds an GPIO LED boot status for IGEP > boards. > > The GPIO LED used is the red LED0 while the Linux > kernel uses the green LED0 as the boot status. > > By using different GPIO LEDs, the user can know in > which step of the boot process the board currently is. > > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas > javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk
Acked-by: Igor Grinberg grinberg@compulab.co.il
Hello Tom,
Any news of merging this patch?
Things look good, sorry. I'm going to try and get to starting a next branch but I might not get a chance before the next release.
- -- Tom
Great, waiting for the next release is not an issue.
There are also two more patches for IGEP boards that were acked but not picked for this release:
[U-Boot,v2,1/2] OMAP3: use a single board file for IGEP devices [1] [U-Boot,1/1] OMAP3: igep00x0: add CONFIG_SPL_BOARD_INIT for CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SUPPORT [2]
For the second path, did SPL+NAND for the IGEP devices get added already?
- -- Tom
Yes, it was added on mainline commit d271a6114 "OMAP3: igep00x0: add SPL support for IGEP-based boards"
Before posting that patch I only tested SPL booting from the uSD/MMC and later when trying SPL boot from NAND I realized that CONFIG_SPL_BOARD_INIT was missing to initialize the GPMC.
Sorry, my bad. I should have tested both MMC and NAND booting before posting the SPL support patch.
OK, that makes it a bugfix. Albert, OK if I pull a bugfix patch (adding a #define to a config) for a TI platform into master or do you want it to go via u-boot-ti -> u-boot-arm ? Thanks!
- -- Tom