Hi Peng,
On 28 July 2015 at 08:48, Peng Fan Peng.Fan@freescale.com wrote:
If there is no property named 'regulator-name' for regulators, choose node name instead, but not directly return failure value.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan Peng.Fan@freescale.com Cc: Przemyslaw Marczak p.marczak@samsung.com Cc: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
drivers/power/regulator/regulator-uclass.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/power/regulator/regulator-uclass.c b/drivers/power/regulator/regulator-uclass.c index 12e141b..d4f06d5 100644 --- a/drivers/power/regulator/regulator-uclass.c +++ b/drivers/power/regulator/regulator-uclass.c @@ -256,7 +256,9 @@ static int regulator_post_bind(struct udevice *dev) if (!uc_pdata->name) { debug("%s: dev: %s has no property 'regulator-name'\n", __func__, dev->name);
return -EINVAL;
uc_pdata->name = fdt_get_name(blob, offset, NULL);if (!uc_pdata->name)return -EINVAL; } if (regulator_name_is_unique(dev, uc_pdata->name))-- 1.8.4
What is this for please? Can you point me to the device tree binding that needs this? I suspect it is fine, but I would like to understand the purpose.
Regards, Simon