Hello Gerlando,
On 27.07.2012 16:11, Gerlando Falauto wrote:
Hi all,
On 03/09/2011 02:21 PM, Detlev Zundel wrote:
Hi Heiko,
Maybe a way to go ... more comments?
Below a patch, which introduces a function, which checks for "protection bugfixes", and if no bugfix is found the old code is executed. Just a fast RFC patch.
bye, Heiko
[...]
Can't we introduce a field "chip_quirk" in flash_info_t, and upon flash enumeration check for the specific chip version and for example put a CFI_QUIRK_PROTECT in it for this chip. The core code can then check for this flag and call functions appropriately.
In other words, why not introduce a generic infrastructure for handling chip quirks that may need different handling for other functions also.
Cheers Detlev
Have there been (since the original posting) other instances of flash parts requiring quirks (like the original one introduced by Philippe De Muyter for the Numonyx chip)?
I don´t know ...
Is there any ongoing activity on this or any other reason to suggest it might be necessary to introduce such generic infrastructure (like the one in linux mtd, the way I understand it)?
I have no current activity on this ...
If that's not the case, wouldn't Heicho's original patch in this thread (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/86063/) just be good enough for the purpose?
I am here on Detlevs side, but if it is currently only one usecase here, maybe "my" patch is enough ... Stefan? Detlev?
bye, Heiko