On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 10:20 AM jiladahe1997@gmail.com jiladahe1997@gmail.com wrote:
From 934d43a647bfee33f32f710500c75ef2490f25f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mingrui Ren jiladahe1997@gmail.com Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 20:35:11 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] board/imx6sabresd: add imx6solo during FIT matching
When using imx6solo cpu, the 'board_fit_config_name_match' function will return -1, then u-boot will choose wrong FIT, and causing further problems.
imx6solo is similar to imx6dl, so I just add it into imx6dl.
Signed-off-by: Mingrui Ren jiladahe1997@gmail.com
board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6sabresd.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6sabresd.c b/board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6sabresd.c index 8c35230855..0bd968411e 100644 --- a/board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6sabresd.c +++ b/board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6sabresd.c @@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ int board_fit_config_name_match(const char *name) } else if (is_mx6dqp()) { if (!strcmp(name, "imx6qp-sabresd")) return 0;
} else if (is_mx6dl()) {
} else if (is_mx6dl() || is_mx6solo()) {
I thought that NXP did not manufacture any mx6solo sabresd board, only mx6dl/q/qp sabresd.
Do you have access to a mx6solo sabresd? Or did you make this change because you have designed your own board based on the sabresd with a mx6solo device.
Please clarify.