20 Jun
2014
20 Jun
'14
4:10 p.m.
--- a/common/cmd_nand.c +++ b/common/cmd_nand.c @@ -462,6 +462,53 @@ static void adjust_size_for_badblocks(loff_t *size,
for (i = 0; i < p->eccbytes; i++) {if (i && !(i % 9))printf("\n ");printf("%2d ", p->eccpos[i]);}Why 9?
It's to print a new line on every 9th character position. I'll add a comment.
OK, Scott, breath... I got this one. It'll be OK...
Ivan, I am confident Scott understood that a newline would be generated every ninth-character. We all get that. I think what Scott was asking was why the value 9 was chosen? Why not 10? Or 8? Or 145? Was it to fit some arbitrary line length or screen size? Would it make more sense to use something familiar like a base 10 or half of base-16?
Thanks, jdl