1 Sep
2010
1 Sep
'10
9:30 a.m.
Jens Scharsig schrieb:
Am 2010-08-31 09:36, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
Hi, } -- 1.6.0.2
Applied to u-boot-atmel/next Thanks,
Reinhard
What is the reason for the new branch/Custodian Tree u-boot-atmel.
Hello,
one reason is that AVR32 and AT91 share alot in the peripheral building blocks, so many drivers are both for AVR32 and AT91.
I will try to make sure changes to drivers in that area are not breaking either architecture.
On that behalf I'd like a briefing why there is
at91_emac AND macb?
macb works for AVR32AP700x and (at least) for AT91SAM9260/9G20/9XE.
What is the deal with at91_emac? Is it required for some AT91's because macb does not work there?
Does it provide better "results" than macb?
Best Regards Reinhard