Re: [U-Boot-Users] Breakage of board ports on new features.

In message 45750057.3030400@orkun.us you wrote:

What I am saying is that you should rename existing CONFIG_MPC8349 to CONFIG_MPC834X and only on the boards that actually use 8349 define the CONFIG_MPC8349 (in addition, not in lieu of). Of course other boards using other member (8343, 8347) need to have their specific CONFIG_MPC8343 and CONFIG_MPC8347 options defined appropriately as well (again in addition to CONFIG_MPC834X). It is better to do this while the number of boards is small.

Anyway, I just pointed to the existing practice in U-Boot. In the end, it's probably Wolfgang's decision as U-Boot project leader.

You said exactly what I had in mind. Just much better.

Thanks.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk