On 05/10/2011 07:39 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
Hi, Stefano,
Hi Jason,
2011/4/27 Stefano Babic sbabic@denx.de:
On 04/27/2011 11:39 AM, Detlev Zundel wrote:
Then why not rename the driver to something else than "fsl_pmic"? Maybe this is what Jason really is asking?
Yes, of course, no problem at all. Jason, if you meant to drop the fsl_ to make the driver more general, I completely agree. Sorry, I have not got the point.
Sorry for the late response due to some reason. :(
No problem at all.
Yes, We had better rename fsl_ to something else, I would like use generic_pmic or something else, what's your idea?
I am open for new names. Probably we should state that this driver is a wrapper when SPI or I2C is used, and something like spi_i2c_pmic gives a better idea. With generic_pmic we could think there is a general layout for PMICs (and it is not true).
Best regards, Stefano Babic