
17 Feb
2013
17 Feb
'13
9:07 p.m.
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Fabio Estevam festevam@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Otavio Salvador otavio@ossystems.com.br wrote:
The i.MX23 just one USB port so we shouldn't mess up with PLL1CTRL and
I think "MX23 has just one USB port" would be better.
-int ehci_hcd_init(int index, struct ehci_hccr **hccr, struct ehci_hcor **hcor) +static void soc_ehci_hcd_enable_clock(void)
Since this is mxs specific a better name would be: mxs_ehci_hcd_enable_clock
I did it but mxs gives the impression it does mostly the same in both socs; as the code is mostly different between both I choose soc so it is clear it is for the soc it is being build.
That was my thought... what do you think?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br