Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP5432: do not apply 5430 non-essential pad-confs to 5432

On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 06:04:37PM +0200, Sebastien Jan wrote:

Some of the non-essential 5432 pads have a different purpose compared to 5430, so do not apply the 5430 non-essential pads configuration to 5432. Essential pad confs are common and can/shall be shared.

Signed-off-by: Sebastien Jan s-jan@ti.com

One of the things that's been discussed before is that enabling "non-essential" things can lead to PM problems later in the kernel, so should we be enabling anything U-Boot doesn't really need, ever, in these cases?