On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:53:06PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
[sorry I wrote this yesterday and didn't send]
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
[take 2 for me, gmail defaults to reply not reply-all]
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Simon Glass sjg@google.com wrote:
[..]
Generic board is also a big change, but since it is sort-of parallel to existing code and only turned on on a board-by-board basis the risk is lower - it just need some weeks of review time IMO.
Sounds good, thanks!
And generic board is in also now, which is a big step. Thanks for all your effort on that.
I am about to rev the verified boot series, and FIT image series base on feedback.
Also, what is happening on the TPM side? I think we have all the pieces for making the TPM work properly in U-Boot, as previously discussed. Along with verified boot we have a pretty solid implementation now.
So, I really want Wolfgang to weigh in on the verified boot side of things (and I need to review it harder and think myself). On a related note, have you seen http://prosauce.org/blog/2013/2/11/embedded-trust-p2-u-boot-secured-boot.htm... yet? It almost looks like easy enough that I could get that wired up here but is also another real life case we should take into account and make easy enough to handle and support in mainline.