Dear Łukasz Dałek,
On 31.08.2012 00:04, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Łukasz Dałek,
On 30.08.2012 21:09, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Łukasz Dałek,
I've moved cpu revision detection to arch/arm/cpu/pxa as you suggest. Cleaned ethernet driver. Soon I would also send patches for drivers/usb/gadget/ether.c to work correctly with this pxa driver.
Łukasz Dałek (2): pxa: Add some stuff to examine cpu model and rev pxa25x: Add USB ethernet gadget
arch/arm/cpu/pxa/cpuinfo.c | 11 +- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-pxa/pxa.h | 13 + drivers/usb/gadget/Makefile | 1 + drivers/usb/gadget/pxa25x_udc.c | 2059
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/usb/gadget/pxa25x_udc.h
| 168 +++ | 5 files changed, 2250 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/usb/gadget/pxa25x_udc.c create mode 100644 drivers/usb/gadget/pxa25x_udc.h
Just a dumb question -- do we have any actual user for this stuff?
Best regards, Marek Vasut
Me. I have iPAQ h2200 but my patches for this paltmop aren't in the source tree. There is a chance that we don't have any device which uses this.
Why don't you add support for this ipaq too then ?
I will but first of all I want to finish with pxa25x udc drivers and with bugs in CDC ether driver (ether.c). Then I will send patches adding support for my device.
I'll put those patches on hold then, as it is pointless to put unused code into the tree.
Łukasz Dałek
Best regards, Marek Vasut
Best regards, Marek Vasut