10 Aug
2007
10 Aug
'07
7:11 p.m.
to the 834x processors as well. So my questions is two fold: 1) why
doesn't the MPC8349ITX board define CONFIG_MPC83XX to pick it up,
and 2)
it should, but Linux works without it because the ITX only went into ARCH=powerpc kernels which get the immr from device tree.
That makes sense then. Thanks. I have discovered that somehow (still working on the how :) ), there's a -DCONFIG_MPC83XX on the command line to gcc. So in reality it was being defined, just not in my board config file.
should I be doing so for an MPC8347E processor?
I thought so, thanks again for the feedback.
Bruce