On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 10:43:38AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On 6 April 2017 at 10:27, Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 10:24:09AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On 6 April 2017 at 10:23, Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:27:16AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
There is no need to have this call in the generic init sequence and no other architecture has needed it in the time it has been there. Move it into sandbox's private code.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese sr@denx.de Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese sr@denx.de
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
I was just about to resend that series to fix the cover letter...but perhaps it doesn't matter.
I'm resending the second series now.
Yeah, you'll want to re-sync stuff, sorry. I did have a few fixups to do as I applied these, but mainly due to removing sparc/blackfin/openrisc first.
Yes I was assuming the removal would go in before my series, so that's good. I think you've applied everything except this patch:
board_f: Rename initdram() to dram_init()Is that right? If so, I'll respin and resend. I hope it wasn't too much work!
Correct, and it wasn't hard, no. But with initdram() what I was trying to stress yesterday was that we have some use cases where both functions are used and in different ways. So some of the platforms will need a real think on how to get the same functionality still. I'm not sure if I was clear enough yesterday. Thanks again!