On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 12:45:33PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
When EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL is selected there is unwritten dependency on sha384 and sha512.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek michal.simek@xilinx.com
/opt/Xilinx/Vitis/2020.2/gnu/aarch64/lin/aarch64-linux/bin/../x86_64-petalinux-linux/usr/bin/aarch64-xilinx-linux/aarch64-xilinx-linux-ld.bfd.real: lib/built-in.o: in function `tcg2_create_digest': /mnt/disk/u-boot/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c:546: undefined reference to `sha384_starts' /opt/Xilinx/Vitis/2020.2/gnu/aarch64/lin/aarch64-linux/bin/../x86_64-petalinux-linux/usr/bin/aarch64-xilinx-linux/aarch64-xilinx-linux-ld.bfd.real: /mnt/disk/u-boot/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c:547: undefined reference to `sha384_update' /opt/Xilinx/Vitis/2020.2/gnu/aarch64/lin/aarch64-linux/bin/../x86_64-petalinux-linux/usr/bin/aarch64-xilinx-linux/aarch64-xilinx-linux-ld.bfd.real: /mnt/disk/u-boot/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c:548: undefined reference to `sha384_finish' /opt/Xilinx/Vitis/2020.2/gnu/aarch64/lin/aarch64-linux/bin/../x86_64-petalinux-linux/usr/bin/aarch64-xilinx-linux/aarch64-xilinx-linux-ld.bfd.real: /mnt/disk/u-boot/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c:552: undefined reference to `sha512_starts' /opt/Xilinx/Vitis/2020.2/gnu/aarch64/lin/aarch64-linux/bin/../x86_64-petalinux-linux/usr/bin/aarch64-xilinx-linux/aarch64-xilinx-linux-ld.bfd.real: /mnt/disk/u-boot/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c:553: undefined reference to `sha512_update' /opt/Xilinx/Vitis/2020.2/gnu/aarch64/lin/aarch64-linux/bin/../x86_64-petalinux-linux/usr/bin/aarch64-xilinx-linux/aarch64-xilinx-linux-ld.bfd.real: /mnt/disk/u-boot/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c:554: undefined reference to `sha512_finish'
lib/efi_loader/Kconfig | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig b/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig index e44f004f3f8d..2b522c9151ad 100644 --- a/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig +++ b/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig @@ -300,6 +300,8 @@ config EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL config EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL bool "EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL support" depends on TPM_V2
- select SHA512
- select SHA384 help Provide a EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL implementation using the TPM hardware of the platform.
-- 2.31.0
There's also SHA1 and SHA256 in that code. Are those included by default or we should explicitly add them as well?
Thanks /Ilias