On 08/15/2018 12:32 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 6:21 PM, Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On 08/15/2018 08:20 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
Bitmask for EMAC should be bit-0, EMAC1 bit-8 and EMAC2 bit-16.
Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan ley.foon.tan@intel.com
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/system_manager_s10.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/system_manager_s10.h b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/system_manager_s10.h index 813dff2..297f9e1 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/system_manager_s10.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/system_manager_s10.h @@ -146,9 +146,9 @@ struct socfpga_system_manager { #define SYSMGR_FPGAINTF_SDMMC BIT(8) #define SYSMGR_FPGAINTF_SPIM0 BIT(16) #define SYSMGR_FPGAINTF_SPIM1 BIT(24) -#define SYSMGR_FPGAINTF_EMAC0 (0x11 << 0) -#define SYSMGR_FPGAINTF_EMAC1 (0x11 << 8) -#define SYSMGR_FPGAINTF_EMAC2 (0x11 << 16)
Wasn't the point here to unreset the OCP bits alongside the standard EMAC resets too ?
No, these registers are nothing related to reset. These for FPGA interface registers if we route the peripheral pins to use FPGA IO.
OK, applied.