On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:39 PM Jagan Teki jagan@amarulasolutions.com wrote:
Handling probing code for a particular uclass between dm vs nodm always confusing and requires additional ifdefs to handle them properly.
But, having separate low-level code bases for dm and nodm can make it easy for the command level to use same function name to probe the devices. This would indeed avoid extra ifdef call in source code.
So, this patch probes the spi flash in common legacy call spi_flash_probe for both dm and nodm devices and give a chance to handle on respective code bases based on the build files.
Cc: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org Cc: Vignesh R vigneshr@ti.com Cc: Daniel Schwierzeck daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki jagan@amarulasolutions.com
I'm moving with this since we still have few drivers left for nondm code for SPL.
Jagan.