22 Oct
2010
22 Oct
'10
9:24 a.m.
On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:22 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message 1287731621-19353-1-git-send-email-galak@kernel.crashing.org you wrote:
The recent change the env code added an additional 32 bytes into gd_t and that causes to grow pass the previous CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_SIZE size.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala galak@kernel.crashing.org
One thing I always wondered is why we don't simply use sizeof(gd_t) instead. What do you think?
I was wondering the same thing, let me try it and see what happens.
- k