8 Jul
2009
8 Jul
'09
12:10 a.m.
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message E9C9002C-21B8-4001-8895-D04FDCD24077@kernel.crashing.org you wrote:
Because NFS support is pretty small in terms of code size and pretty useful in terms of download speed (usually much faster than TFTP, and less restricted, too).
its about 7k of size in my MPC8572DS config
... only if you include BSS into the calculation, which is not fair, as BSS costs nothing.
text data bss dec hex filename396624 50716 44181 491521 78001 u-boot 392120 50536 41957 484613 76505 u-boot (w/o CMD_NFS)
Seems like the 2k buff for the path is overkill.
Bss?
(396624-392120+50716-50536) = 4.5 kB.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
Comparing information and knowledge is like asking whether the
fatness of a pig is more or less green than the designated hitter
rule." - David Guaspari