Dear Timur,
In message 48E6A9D5.4050307@freescale.com you wrote:
The PRINTD is irrelevant. If these platforms really want to debug single I2C operations, they can add the code back. It's just debug code, so I would think that it's not worth sacrificing the improved code simplicity just for that.
This is your opinion. I think you cannot really speak for others. I think you should ask the respective maintainers of the code first before changing their code.
And when you claim "We can save space" - which sort of space are you talking about? Dos this reduce the memory footprint of the code?
I ran a couple tests, and u-boot.bin didn't change in size, but technically, it should be smaller because the compiler will optimize the code into a normal call to i2c_read or i2c_write.
Hm... why didn't the size change, then?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk