-----Original Message----- From: Troy Kisky [mailto:troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com] Sent: 2018年7月28日 1:58 To: Peng Fan peng.fan@nxp.com; sbabic@denx.de; Fabio Estevam fabio.estevam@nxp.com; Anatolij Gustschin agust@denx.de Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; dl-linux-imx linux-imx@nxp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/32] i.MX: Add i.MX8QXP support
On 7/27/2018 12:54 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
Hi All,
I plan to send out V3 early next week. QXP BETA2 has been external released,
so there will be update in README including link to scfw images.
Paste the link here first:
https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.n xp.com%2Flgfiles%2FNMG%2FMAD%2FYOCTO%2Fimx-sc-firmware-0.7.bin&am p;data=02%7C01%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7C52c05286470740a94b8108d5f3 ea8460%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C63668311092 8936620&sdata=F%2B5oZqolFv22cWbgAS2CZu4YL4iS%2FhtpKt4MT8DJsQ U%3D&reserved=0, use mx8qx-mek-scfw-tcm.bin for b0 chip.
Troy, Fabio, Stefano,
I would like to still keep CONFIG_IMX8, not CONFIG_MX8. Do you have
concerns?
Thanks, Peng.
I like consistency, but I would not mind changing CONFIG_MX* to CONFIG_IMX* as well.
i.MX6/7 could be the next to be converted.
Would it be possibly to change CONFIG_ARCH_MX* to CONFIG_IMX* as well ? I never know which to use when.
There is no difference now I think.
In Linux side there is CONFIG_ARCH_MXC for i.mx6/7/5. In u-boot, each SOC family has its own CONFIG_ARCH_MX*.
That could be cleaned up to use CONFIG_IMX* I think.
Thanks, Peng.
Linux mainline seems to use CONFIG_SOC_IMX6=y CONFIG_SOC_IMX6Q=y CONFIG_SOC_IMX6SL=y CONFIG_SOC_IMX6SLL=y CONFIG_SOC_IMX6SX=y CONFIG_SOC_IMX6UL=y
so maybe changing to that format has merit.
But I'll be happy with whatever is decided, as long as the reasons are on record.
Troy