Hi Stefano,
On 7/19/2010 12:11 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
I always wondered why we need such a long (and slow to type) name. I suggest we use this opportunity and change the name into a plain and simple "FEC" resp. "SCC" and "FCC" ?
Then probably unify the rule even for other architectures. We have a "FEC_MXC", too, for Freescale's i.MX processors. We can use "FEC_PPC", "SCC_PPC" if we want to add the architecture name (I do not think is useful), or better set the name to "FEC" for fec_mxc.c, too.
Best regards, Stefano Babic
Unless you have a chip with both MXC and PPC FECs, which I doubt, I don't think the extra namespace buys anything. Saving a few keystrokes, on the other hand (no pun intended) is a good thing.
regards, Ben