On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 09:48:43AM +0000, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote:
Hi Maxime and Tom
I think I need to cross-check my initial requirements on my side for the boot from NAND scenario (because the project to will use SPL but also a other primary bootloader)
Since the beginning the GPT was a strong request to have common behavior fot block device and MTD device but after it seens too difficult to guaranty boot with NAND constraint.
With your feedback, I will try to drop this requirement.... I will check this point internally and to push to switch to UBIFS.
Thanks for the remarks,
But finally I will drop this patchset, as I convinced my project to no don't use GPT for NOR and NAND devices after Maxime remarks.
Tom: what is the better way to drop all the patchset (with patman or with patchwork)
Change state to rejected with patchwork ?
I moved them to deferred or rejected, I forget which, yes.