On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 12:49:10 +0200 Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
On 6/14/19 12:41 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
Hi Marek,
On 6/14/19 8:49 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
This commit copies from the Linux kernel (tag v5.1.2) i.MX28 related device tree files.
Linux 5.1.9 is already out,
I will check if there are any differences and update.
commit hash is missing. Shouldn't the tags be something like "ARM: dts: imx" ? Fix the tags globally.
With those tags it is indeed interesting.
As fair as I know those are used by patman to indicate automatically the receiver(s).
One can see them defined in ./doc/git-mailrc
And we now have "dts" - which is not defined there, but shows the "purpose/target" subsystem.
The "arm" causes sending mail to u-boot, Tom and Albert. The "imx" to uboot and Stefano.
This might be important if I did not used Series-cc: and Series-to: from patman (which I did).
I would appreciate if there were any guidelines to use those tags (there aren't any for Linux though, just there is an Maintainer's "convention").
By "convention" I mean a sorting rule in Maintainer's mail program set arbitrarily to filter out not eligible patches :-)
The general agreement was to stick with the linux tags, and that's what git log --oneline arch/arm/dts would indicate as well. Maybe patman needs to be fixed to stop inventing weird tags.
Simon, do you have any thoughts regarding patman's tag policy (after the time that we do use patman) ?
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@denx.de