Dear Vadim,
In message CAC3GErHOF06DVZqGGnd89hW00GNjU=wg8cfyoGgCbEB1martsw@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
Gentlemen, I have not forgotten our discussion regarding setting up a sample gerrit server for u-boot during the ELCE mini-summit. Sorry for this long and not very clear email, if there is any interest I will be glad to answer questions and address concerns to the best of my ability, and I am sure Simon (sjg@) will pitch in.
Thanks for the efforts.
I have a few questions:
For the purposes of this demo the patches submitted for review were generated by a script I wrote. The script scrapes http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/, downloads the patches from there and tries applying them. Not all patches apply cleanly (as some of them are for branches).
Can you not pick up the patches directly from the mailing list? I mean, we know of the problems patchwork has (like silently dropping certain base64 / utf8 encoded messages), so we should rather try and get a more reliable feed for the patches?
Any one can upload patches to this server after creating an account on it. Any Google account will do, or if you don't want to have a Google based email you can create the account using your existing email. Follow the prompts after clicking on 'Sign in' link on the top right.
Is my understanding correct that I have to use or create a google account in any case to participate in this type of work? What if I am not willing to accept Google's Terms of Service, or to register an account with google for other reasons?
After signing up one should create a password for authentication with the server. Click on the little black triangle next to your name in the top right, then on 'Settings' and then on 'HTTP Password'. Save the lines generated by this in ~/.netrc (with permissions set to 0400) and you are good to go.
For me nothing happens when I click on "settings". I just see for a fraction of a second as small pop-up "working", and then nothing.
This server is not configured yet, but in general gerrit allows for three levels of reviewers - those who can just comment, those who can assign a +1 rating to the change (an equivalent of an acked by) and those who can assign a +2 rating or push the change (the custodians). There is no point in setting these up on a mirror, but if so desired, it could be done.
How can we arrange to keep the mailing list in sync?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk