
From: U-Boot u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de on behalf of AKASHI Takahiro takahiro.akashi@linaro.org Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2023 12:07 PM
In SCMI base protocol version 2 (0x20000), new interfaces, BASE_SET_DEVICE_PERMISSIONS/BASE_SET_PROTOCOL_PERMISSIONS/ BASE_RESET_AGENT_CONFIGURATION, were added. Moreover, the api of BASE_DISCOVER_AGENT was changed to support self-agent discovery.
So the driver expects SCMI firmware support version 2 of base protocol.
Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro takahiro.akashi@linaro.org
v6
- new commit
drivers/firmware/scmi/base.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/scmi/base.c b/drivers/firmware/scmi/base.c index ee84e261945a..1d41a8a98fc6 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/scmi/base.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/scmi/base.c @@ -481,6 +481,7 @@ static int scmi_base_reset_agent_configuration_int(struct udevice *dev, */ static int scmi_base_probe(struct udevice *dev) {
u32 version; int ret; ret = devm_scmi_of_get_channel(dev);
@@ -488,6 +489,13 @@ static int scmi_base_probe(struct udevice *dev) dev_err(dev, "get_channel failed\n"); return ret; }
ret = scmi_base_protocol_version_int(dev, &version);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "getting protocol version failed\n");
return ret;
}
if (version < SCMI_BASE_PROTOCOL_VERSION)
return -EINVAL;
LGTM. The open source SCMI server implementations I'm aware of (scp-firmware, tf-a and optee-os) all report SCMI Base protocol version v2.0. Reviewed-by: Etienne Carriere etienne.carriere@foss.st.com
That said, maybe a more flexible implementation would support both version v1.0 (0x10000) and v2.0 but disable permission commands for v1.0 compliant servers. Maybe in a later change, if there is a need for. I fear using such strict minima protocol version values for other SCMI procotols make U-Boot client too restrictive.
BR, Etienne
return ret;
}
2.34.1