Hi Heiko,
On Monday 30 July 2012 13:07:07 Heiko Schocher wrote:
If that's not the case, wouldn't Heicho's original patch in this thread (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/86063/) just be good enough for the purpose?
I am here on Detlevs side, but if it is currently only one usecase here, maybe "my" patch is enough ... Stefan? Detlev?
After looking into this issue again, I'm in favor to accepting Heiko's patch to fix this problem. Detlev's suggestion would have been better of course. But since we really only have one use-case right now, it seems a bit unfair to request/demand the installation of such a quirk infrastructure for this fix.
Heiko, could you please send an updated patch with a complete patch description? And also please don't use magic numbers like 0x89 but INTEL_MANUFACT.
Thanks, Stefan