On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 02:29:15PM -0700, Tom Warren wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Tom Rini [mailto:tom.rini@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tom Rini Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 1:53 PM To: Stephen Warren; Wolfgang Denk Cc: Simon Schwarz; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Tom Warren Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] arm: fix bootm with device tree
- PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 02:42:26PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 04/19/2012 03:30 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On 04/19/2012 02:09 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
From: Stephen Warrenswarren@nvidia.com
Commit 0a672d4 "arm: Add Prep subcommand support to bootm" re-organized do_bootm_linux() for ARM. During the re-organization, the code to pass the device tree to the kernel was removed. Add it back. This restores the ability to boot a kernel using device tree.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warrenswarren@nvidia.com
Acked-by: Tom Rini trini@ti.com
Who's going to take this patch through their tree? Is it Albert or Wolfgang directly, or should I ask Tom Warren to do it through the Tegra tree?
I would suggest Wolfgang directly.
I have it in my u-boot-tegra/next branch on denx right now, just so I can test kernel boot. It's arch/arm/lib/bootm.c, though, so shouldn't it go thru Albert's tree?
It's a relatively obvious fix (since it restores code that was removed by accident). And since Wolfgang wants to release tomorrow, I think it's reasonable to just have this go in, unless Albert snags this and sends off a PR right away. :)