Mike Frysinger vapier@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
Mike Frysinger vapier@gentoo.org wrote:
explicitly cc-ing the atmel guys just so there's no surprise when at91/avr32 have been handled over to someone else without their explicit ACK ...
So...what exactly are you Cc'ing us on?
read the thread
That sort of brings us back to my original question, doesn't it?
<reads the archives>
Ok, so there are complaints about the non-responsiveness of some of Atmel's custodians and a wish for someone to take over. Fine by me, I guess, since I've already indicated I'm probably not the right person for the job anymore. I can't speak for the AT91 team, however.
But it does seem kind of rude to just hand everything off without Cc'ing any of the maintainers in question. Perhaps they would respond more quickly if people actually send e-mail to them?
Btw, I'm not ranting at you, Mike. Thanks for letting me know about the discussion, although I would have preferred a bit more context...
For the record, the thread seems to be this one, but I seem to be unable to find the start of it...
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-August/074769.html
Haavard