Hi Bin,
On 23 July 2015 at 02:46, Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
Add support for building U-Boot as an EFI application with a .efi suffix. This can be loaded by EFI provided that EFI has the same bit width (32- or 64-bit) as U-Boot. This unfortunate limitation is imposed by EFI.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
Makefile | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index e0218b3..91ebc2e 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -752,6 +752,7 @@ ifneq ($(CONFIG_SPL_TARGET),) ALL-$(CONFIG_SPL) += $(CONFIG_SPL_TARGET:"%"=%) endif ALL-$(CONFIG_REMAKE_ELF) += u-boot.elf +ALL-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EFI) += u-boot.efi
Can we use u-boot-app.efi?
ifneq ($(BUILD_ROM),) ALL-$(CONFIG_X86_RESET_VECTOR) += u-boot.rom @@ -1080,6 +1081,10 @@ u-boot-dtb-tegra.bin: u-boot-nodtb-tegra.bin dts/dt.dtb FORCE endif endif
+OBJCOPYFLAGS_u-boot.efi := $(OBJCOPYFLAGS_EFI)
Where is OBJCOPYFLAGS_EFI introduced? Can we move that into this patch?
It's in the x86 patch - I don't want to mix generic code with arch-specific code, so have kept it separate.
+u-boot.efi: u-boot FORCE
$(call if_changed,zobjcopy)u-boot-img.bin: spl/u-boot-spl.bin u-boot.img FORCE $(call if_changed,cat)
--
Regards, Bin
Regards, Simon