Hi Bo Shen,
Thanks for the check, please see below.
On 28.10.2013 05:57, Bo Shen wrote:
Hi Mateusz Kulikowski, Add Andreas in loop.
On 10/28/2013 03:34, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote:
(...)
- /*
* Disable pull-up on:* RXDV (PC25) => PHY normal mode (not Test mode)* ERX0 (PE25) => PHY ADDR0* ERX1 (PE26) => PHY ADDR1 => PHYADDR = 0x0** PHY has internal pull-down*/- writel(1 << 25, &pio->pioc.pudr);
- writel((1 << 25) | (1 << 26), &pio->pioe.pudr);
Use GPIO API instead of hard code.
Should I also update (in separate patch) at91sam9263ek board (code is the same there, bad side is - I don't have that board to test)?
+#define CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE 0x23f00000
This address should be considered as u-boot is top down map, so if your system only 64MiB, there is only 1MiB left.
I don't understand something here: - this address is hardcoded in AT91bootstrap (as well as image size - 0x31000),
- I can change it, but it will not boot on "stock" board - should we force people to recompile AT91bootstrap if they want to use new U-Boot? or - Should I add low-level initialization to boot U-Boot from Dataflash without AT91bootstrap (this is a bit more work)? or - There is another way I'm not aware of (perhaps relocate U-Boot in RAM)?
Best Regards, Mateusz Kulikowski