
Hi Marek,
On Jul 27, 2015, at 23:39 , Marek Vasut marex@denx.de wrote:
Endless timeouts are bad, since if we get stuck in one, we have no way out. Zap this one by implementing proper timeout.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marex@denx.de Cc: Dinh Nguyen dinguyen@opensource.altera.com Cc: Pantelis Antoniou panto@antoniou-consulting.com Cc: Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com
drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c index 3fffa71..0f61f16 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/dw_mmc.c @@ -211,14 +211,29 @@ static int dwmci_send_cmd(struct mmc *mmc, struct mmc_cmd *cmd, }
if (data) {
do {
start = get_timer(0);
timeout = 1000;
for (;;) { mask = dwmci_readl(host, DWMCI_RINTSTS);
/* Error during data transfer. */ if (mask & (DWMCI_DATA_ERR | DWMCI_DATA_TOUT)) { printf("%s: DATA ERROR!\n", __func__); bounce_buffer_stop(&bbstate); return -1; }
} while (!(mask & DWMCI_INTMSK_DTO));
/* Data arrived correctly. */
if (mask & DWMCI_INTMSK_DTO)
break;
/* Check for timeout. */
if (get_timer(start) > timeout) {
printf("%s: Timeout waiting for data!\n",
__func__);
bounce_buffer_stop(&bbstate);
return TIMEOUT;
}
}
dwmci_writel(host, DWMCI_RINTSTS, mask);
-- 2.1.4
Applied, thanks
— Pantelis