On 05/17/2012 07:48 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 17 May 2012 14:43:45 Tom Rini wrote:
I'd like to propose making 'i2c probe' be a command that is opt-out'able. In the Linux Kernel the notion of probing for devices was abandoned a while ago due to, in short, devices misbehaving when randomly poked at. Over in omap24xx_i2c land we changed our probe method a while ago from an attempted read to an attempted write as some i2c devices would NAK the read. But now with the am33xx SoM family we have a new issue which is that attempting to write to an address doesn't immediately issue a NAK so probe sees all addresses as valid and in turn leaves the bus upset. I've worked around this for now by making i2c_probe use the read method instead, only on am33xx (so most devices would be spotted, but the ones that caused the initial change would not show up). But a possibly better solution is to just make the i2c probe command not implemented for am33xx (as you don't have to run i2c probe to try and use your device).
i've always seen the "i2c probe" command as a debugging tool, not something that you need to do to make things work. so along those lines, isn't it already optional ? if you don't like it, don't run it :).
Including a command that doesn't work and saying "ah, just don't use that" is asking for trouble. I'm going down the "what changed in the IP block, really" rat-hole now (since I've got the original test working). But still, the kernel decided i2c probing is dangerous/unreliable, maybe we should follow, or at least allow boards to follow?