On Wednesday, March 04, 2015 at 07:34:39 AM, Franck Jullien wrote:
2015-03-03 23:28 GMT+01:00 Marek Vasut marex@denx.de:
On Tuesday, March 03, 2015 at 10:17:11 PM, franck.jullien@gmail.com wrote:
From: Franck Jullien franck.jullien@gmail.com
Mass storage is not necessary present on interface 0. This patch allow usb_stor_scan to look in every available interface.
Signed-off-by: Franck Jullien franck.jullien@gmail.com
Hi!
Do you happen to have such a device which isn't present on interface 0?
Also, can you please rework the patch such that level of indentation would be reasonably low? Possibly by factoring some code into a separate function? I see that the code already has some really nasty indent and your patch even adds to that.
Thank you!
Best regards, Marek Vasut
I do have such a device. However, that's a custom one. For some reasons we couldn't put the mass storage device to interface 0.
Is that something custom you cannot even name ? Possibly an FPGA on USB ?
I was wondering about the level of indentation. You confirmed I need to work on it.
Thank _you_ for working on it and keeping up with my ramblings :)
Best regards, Marek Vasut