Hi Quentin,
On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 17:49, Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 08:37, Quentin Schulz foss+uboot@0leil.net wrote:
From: Quentin Schulz quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com
The binary is looked on the system by the suffix of the packer class. This means binman was looking for btool_gzip on the system and not gzip.
Since a btool can have its btool_ prefix missing but its module and binary presence on the system appropriately found, there's no need to actually keep this prefix after listing all possible btools, so let's remove it.
This fixes gzip btool by letting Bintool.find_bintool_class handle the missing prefix and still return the correct class which is then init with gzip name instead of btool_gzip.
Cc: Quentin Schulz foss+uboot@0leil.net Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com
tools/binman/bintool.py | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
Unfortunately this breaks 'binman test'.
Regards, Simon